As the Court observes at the outset of its opinion, there is reason to believe that respondent participated in an especially brutal murder of an American law enforcement agent. That fact, if true, may explain the Executive's intense interest in punishing [the defendant] in our courts. Such an explanation, however, provides no justification for disregarding the Rule of Law that this Court has a duty to uphold. That the Executive may wish to reinterpret the Treaty to allow for an action that the Treaty in no way authorizes should not influence this Court's interpretation.

Celestia: Home

Nothing but the best for my procrastination efforts.  And, of course, it runs on Linux (and everything else--but especially Linux).

And it's legit.

Politics - Medicare changes may leave seniors confused - sacbee.com